Arkansas Civil War 360

Historical Accounts Of Arkansas Civil War Battles

History Revised by Political Correctness in Louisiana

Posted by Admin on June 18, 2008

The news of the changes in long-standing proclamations declaring Confederate History and Heritage Month observances in Shreveport and Bossier City, Lou­isiana has prompted the following statement from Christopher M. Sullivan,  Commander-in-Chief, Sons of Confederate Veterans:

“We learned with immense dismay of the mayors of Bossier City and Shreveport, Louisiana,  departing from a long- standing tradition of issuing proclama­tions honoring Confederate History and Heritage Month.

“According to local news accounts they have taken it upon themselves to change the observance to ‘Civil War History Month’.

“This is a direct act of political correctness that takes on more serious proportions as it undertakes revising or eliminating true history in America.

“Cities, counties and states annually issue proclamations honoring the vari­ous cultures and events that have made the greatness of America.  Confederate History and Heritage Month is one of the most widely known throughout the United States with hundreds of proclamations and observances each year which honor the Confederate soldiers who are recognized by the U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs with the same rights and recognition as all veterans of U. S. service.

“It is indeed disheartening to see the success of this recognition distorted and intentionally eliminated by a small element whose agenda is to impugn or eradicate the history of the Confederate military.”

“It is our hope the people of Shreveport and Bossier City will show a spirit of fairness and patriotism by effectively speaking out against censorship and historical revision.”

Contact,  J. A. Davis,  SCV PR & Media Committee,  770 297-4788.

SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS PUBLIC RELATIONS AND MEDIA COMMITTEE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

History Revised by Political Correctness in Louisiana

Elm Springs, Columbia, TN

Posted in Historical Doccuments | Leave a Comment »

WHY IS THERE NO ORGANIZED STATE WIDE PRESERVATION ORGANIZATION IN ARKANSAS?

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

By Doyle Taylor

WHY IS THERE NO ORGANIZED STATE WIDE PRESERVATION ORGANIZATION IN ARKANSAS.

While there are several scattered local chapters of the SCV, UDC, Civil War Roundtables, Civil War Trails, county, or local historical preservation associations, who are trying in their own small way to preserve some Civil War Sites, there is no general statewide overall organization, as in other states, made up of people with expertise, that can assist and advise these local preservation organizations on how to go about doing the work of preservation, who know what resources are available to aid the preservation of site, or how to use those resources.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in SCV Member Input | Leave a Comment »

Civil War Generals~Robert E. Lee

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Lee Lee was born at Stratford Hall Plantation, in Westmoreland County, Virginia, the fourth child of Henry Lee and Anne Hill (née Carter) Lee. Henry “Lighthorse Harry” Lee was a Revolutionary War, major-general, cavalry hero. Henry was injured in surpressing a riot in Baltimore and died from the wounds. He was raised by his widowed mother and attended private schools.

Lee went to West Point in 1825.
While there, he became corps adjutant, the chief post of honor for a cadet. He graduated in 1829, ranked 2 out of 46 in his class. When he graduated West Point, he had not only attained the top academic record but was the first cadet to graduate the Academy without a single demerit.

He was commisioned in the Engineers as a 2nd lieutenant and assigned to the Corps of Engineers. Lee served for 17 months at Fort Pulaski on Cockspur Island, Georgia.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Civil War Generals | Leave a Comment »

Civil War Generals~ Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Jackson

Thomas was the third child of Julia (Neale) and Jonathan Jackson, an attorny. He was of Scotch-Irish descent. Two years after his birth, both his father and his sister, Elizabeth, died of typhoid fever. His mother was left alone to raise her children. Ill health and hard times forced her to send her children to live with relatives. Thomas, then 6-years old, and his sister Laura, were taken in by their uncle, Cummins Jackson, who lived at Jackson’s Mill. His mother died in the fall of 1831. Jackson helped around his uncle’s farm. He attended school when and where he could. Records show that he attended classes in the community of Westfield for 39 days in 1837.

In 1839, he attended a school in the assembly room of the first Lewis County courthouse in Weston.

In his later years at Jackson’s Mill, Thomas served as a schoolteacher for 4 months during the winter of 1840-41.

In 1841, Jackson was elected a constable in Lewis County. He was only 17 at the time, a year short of the legal age of 18, necessary to hold the position. He was appointed to West Point in the summer of 1842. At West Point, Jackson struggled to maintain academic proficiency the first few months, he gradually improved his class standing. He graduated, ranked 17 out of 59 in his class, in 1846.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Civil War Generals | Leave a Comment »

Civil War Generals~William J. Hardee

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

hardee Hardee graduated from West Point in 1838. His class rank was 26 out of 45. After graduation, he fought in the Seminole War, frontier duty, and in the Mexican War. he also studied 2 years at the French cavalry school at Saumur, France. During the Mexican War, he was breveted 2 times, was wounded at La Rosia, Mexico, and captured.

He became commandant of cadets at West Point and taught infantry, artillery, and cavalry tactics. While teaching here, he wrote a book,”Rifle and Ligbt Infantry Tactics,” or more familiarly “Hardee’s Tactics,” became the standard textbook and was widely used by both sides during the Civil War.
While assigned as a Lieutenant Colonel in the 1st Cavalry, he resigned his U.S. Army commission on January 31, 1861, 12 days after his home state of Georgia seceded.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Civil War Generals | Leave a Comment »

Civil War Generals~Patrick R. Cleburne

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Cleburne

Appropriately, the native of County Cork was born on St. Patrick’s Day and became the only product of Ireland to become a Confederate major general. Failing the language requirements for a druggist’s degree, he served with the British 41st Regiment of Foot as an officer for a number of years before purchasing his way out.Emigrating to America, he became a druggist and then a highly successful property attorney. He joined the Confederacy in 1861.

He organized the Yell Rifles and with this unit, they seized the Little Rock Arsenal and was commissioned as a captain when Arkansas seceded. He was then sent to Company F, lst Arkansas State Troops in early 1861. He was promoted to Colonel and commanded the lst Arkansas State Troops and 15th Arkansas. Transferred with Lieutenant Gen. William J. Hardee to central Kentucky, he was promoted to Brigadier General and fought at Shiloh and Corinth. Taking part in the Kentucky Campaign, he was wounded at both Richmond and Perryville. Promoted to major general, he commanded a division at Murfreesboro, during the Tullahoma Campaign, and at Chickamauga. A favorite of Pres. Jefferson Davis, he is credited with covering the retreat from Chattanooga after his splendid defense of Tunnel Hill, where he stopped Major Gen. William T. Sherman.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Civil War Generals | Leave a Comment »

FACTS THAT SUPPORT THE SOUTHERN VIEW OF THE CIVIL WAR

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Most books on the Civil War are biased in favor of the Northern view of the conflict. However, in many of these books the careful reader can find a number of facts that support the Southern view of the war. In this article I will document the following facts from mainstream history books:

* Abraham Lincoln knew that an attempt to resupply Fort Sumter could provoke a hostile response from the Confederacy.

* The Confederate states seceded in a democratic, peaceful manner, and most Southerners supported secession. (This refutes the notion expressed by some writers that Southern elitists pulled the South out of the Union against the will of most Southerners.)

* Confederate forces treated Northern citizens and property considerably better than Union forces treated Southern citizens and property.

* Slavery was not the only factor that led the states of the Deep South to secede.

* Lincoln, in his first address to the country as president, threatened to invade the Confederate states if they didn’t pay federal tariffs or if they didn’t allow the federal government to occupy and maintain federal forts in Confederate territory.

* President James Buchanan, Lincoln’s predecessor in the White House, blamed the secession crisis on the North.

* Lincoln held racist views. (It’s only fair to point out that nearly all Americans in that era held racist views.)

* The North had very little moral authority to criticize the South over slavery and race relations.

* Lincoln did not start the war in order to free the slaves.

* The same Congress that imposed the harsh rule of Reconstruction on the South after the war also supported racist policies toward the American Indians.

* Lincoln and other Republicans blocked a widely popular compromise plan that may very well have prevented war, and they refused to allow the people to vote on it in a national referendum.

* Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederate States of America, suspended civil liberties less often than did Lincoln.

* The South did not want war and tried to establish peaceful relations with the North.

* Most Southerners did not believe secession would lead to war.

* The South did not always control the federal government in the three decades leading up to the Civil War. (This is an important point because some critics of the South contend that the South seceded partly over losing the control that it had supposedly held over the federal government for decades.)

* Only a fraction of Southerners owned slaves.

* The Confederate constitution was very similar to the U.S. Constitution and in fact contained several improvements, and it also banned the overseas slave trade and permitted the entrance of free states into the Confederacy.

* Some Confederate leaders criticized slavery and believed blacks should be treated with respect.

* Some Confederate leaders, including Jefferson Davis, were ready and willing to abolish slavery in order to preserve Southern independence.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Historical Doccuments | Leave a Comment »

Tarrifs No Slavery

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Tariffs, Not slavery
by: Jack McMillan, Ph.D.

Contrary to what is now taught, slavery was not the primary issue. Sorry, Julian, Jesse, and victims of public indoctrination everywhere, but here are the inconvenient facts.

The American educational system continues perpetuating a myth regarding the War for Southern Independence [often mistakenly called ‘The Civil War,’ a misnomer.] Teachers using government-mandated, Northern-produced texts inform students the conflict centered solely on slavery, with Abraham Lincoln ‘The Great Emancipator’ sending Union troops to ‘make men free.’ Nothing could be more untrue. We realize the wisdom in the adages that history-books are written by the victors and that truth is war’s first casualty. Like other complex human activities, wars often have a number of underlying causes. In this article, I shall provide the reader with an overview of the primary causi belli of the War for Southern Independence, the issue of tariffs.

Far from being a mundane topic, taxation has been at the heart of the American political spirit. The original thirteen American colonies formally dissolved ties with the British Empire due to the issue of taxation without representation. Penned by that great Virginian Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration of Independence stands out as this nation’s first Article of Secession. In it, the colonies’ grievances are listed. Amongst the litany of injustices committed by King George III, Jefferson mentions ‘For imposing Taxes upon us without our Consent.’ This split over taxation is a recurring theme in American history.

The precursor to Southern secession in fact occurred 30 years before the hostilities of 1861-1865. In 1828 and again in 1832, Congress passed tariffs legislation benefitting northern mercantile interests but injuring the South’s agricultural economy. Heavy protectionist tariffs gave northern manufacturers an advantage by decreasing foreign competition, but forced the South to pay the bulk of federal taxes, as the South was a net exporter of raw goods and a net importer of manufactured products. These ‘Tariffs of Abominations’ led Senator John C. Calhoun to declare the law unjust and a convention was held in South Carolina to nullify the federal tariff law. President Andrew Jackson threatened to send troops to enforce the tariff, but eventually the Compromise of 1833 was reached and taxes were lowered over a four-year period. As Professor Charles Adams states in his book For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization, “…the South paid about three-quarters of all federal taxes, most of which were spent in the North.”

The election of 1860 was perhaps the most contentious in American history. The Democratic Party split, with the northern faction voting for Stephen Douglass and the southern faction for John Breckinridge. Additionally the Constitutional Unionist Party [the renamed Whig Party] ran John Bell as a candidate and carried three states [Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia.] Lincoln won with a mere 39% of the popular and not a single electoral vote from the South. As Salomon DeRothschild, a visitor to America at the time wrote, “This state of affairs could have continued … if the two divisions, South and North, of the Democratic party had not split at the last electoral convention. Since each of them carried a different candidate, they surrendered power to a third thief, Lincoln, the Republican choice.”

The secession of Southern States began with South Carolina, where tax issues had been at the forefront 30 years earlier. Contrary to what is now taught, slavery was not the primary issue. While it is unfortunate slavery existed, the blame cannot placed solely on the South; slavery existed in the North as well [it is interesting to note Delaware, a Northern slave state, refused to ratify the 13th Amendment abolishing the institution.] Further, New England slavers from their homeports in Massachusetts and New York brought slaves to America in the first place.

With the election of Lincoln, the South realized northern manufacturers and bankers would have their puppet in the White House. Again Professor Adams states, “…Lincoln was supported in his bid for the presidency by the rich industrialists of the North. He was their man and he had long been their lawyer… No sooner had Congress assembled in 1861 than the high tariff was passed into law and signed by Lincoln. The Morrill Tariff, as it was called, was the highest tariff in U.S. history.” Adams also notes, “Secession by the South was a reaction against Lincoln’s high-tax policy. In 1861 the slave issue was not critical… The leaders of the South believed secession would attract trade to Charleston, Savannah, and new Orleans, replacing Boston, New York, and Philadelphia as the chief trading ports of America, primarily because of low taxes.” Note the Confederacy lowered taxes! To the charge often leveled that the newly formed Confederacy started the hostilities, Adams correctly points out “…with the import taxes, he [Lincoln] was threatening. Fort Sumter was at the entrance to the Charleston Harbor, filled with federal troops to support U.S. Customs officers. It wasn’t too difficult for angry South Carolinians to fire the first shot.” Again, Rothschild writing to his cousin in London in 1861 notes, “I’ll come back later to the ‘slavery’ question, which was the first pretext for secession, but which was just a pretext and is now secondary. The true reason which impelled the Southern states to secede is the question of tariffs.”

Lincoln’s election guaranteed a return of past disastrous policies and forced the Southern States to secede. Writers of the day confirm this. In Great Britain, many intellectuals and political leaders saw Lincoln’s War for exactly what it was – a dispute over taxation. Charles thingyens writes, “The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern States.” thingyens goes on to say “…Union means so many millions a year lost to the South; secession means the loss of the same millions to the North. The love of money is the root of this as of many other evils… The quarrel between the North and South is, as it stands, solely a fiscal quarrel.” Let us quote a passage from the Northern British Review, Edinburgh, 1862, “…All Northern products are now protected: and the Morrill Tariff is a very masterpiece of folly and injustice. No wonder then that the citizens of the seceding States should feel for half a century they have sacrificed to enhance the powers and profits of the North; and should conclude, after much futile remonstrance, that only in secession could they hope to find redress.”

I shall conclude this article with a passage written by John Reagan, Postmaster General of the Confederacy. “You are not content with the vast millions of tribute we pay you annually under the operation of our revenue laws, our navigation laws, your fishing bounties, and by making your people our manufacturers, our merchants, our shippers. You are not satisfied with the vast tribute we pay you to build up your great cities, your railroads, and your canals. You are not satisfied with the millions of tribute we have been paying you on account of the balance of exchange, which you hold against us. You are not satisfied that we of the South are almost reduced to the condition of overseers of northern capitalists. You are not satisfied with all this; but you must wage a relentless crusade against our rights.”

© 2002 by Connie Ward, 180 Degrees True South 180dts@bellsouth.net

http://www.dixieoutfitters.com/heritage/cw3.shtml

Posted in Historical Doccuments | Leave a Comment »

David O Dodd

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

Of all the war heroes in Arkansas’ history, this is the one with the most monuments in the state — more even than Douglas MacArthur. The short version of his story goes like this. During the Civil War, 17-year-old Dodd, in southern territory, went to Federally occupied Little Rock on a business errand for his dad. On his way back to South Arkansas, troops at a Federal checkpoint found a notebook in his shoe which contained in morse code in Dodd’s own handwriting, a thorough, detailed and perfectly accurate list of all the Union forces in Little Rock.

Ten days later he was hanged as a spy. The heroic part is that he never divulged the source of his information or the name of his spymaster. He was hanged in front of the college he had briefly attended and was buried in a borrowed grave.

Here’s a picture of that borrowed grave and of twenty-one guns going off in his honor at the annual observance of his execution. That eight-foot-tall obelisk to the left of the center of the photograph is his tombstone. There’s nothing on the stone to mark Dodd’s status as a folk hero. It’s just name, place of birth (Lavaca County, Texas), and dates of birth and death. The giant obelisk was put here in 1911 at a cost to the state of $3000. It also contains a grammatical error. “Here lies the remains….”

More can be found here: http://users.aristotle.net/~russjohn/warriors/dodd.html

Posted in Historical Doccuments | Leave a Comment »

The Confederacy, The Union, and the Civil War

Posted by Admin on May 14, 2008

The Confederacy, The Union, and the Civil War – A look at four claims about the War Between the States

Author: Michael T. Griffith

Recently some members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans drafted a statement to be placed on a proposed monument at a Confederate grave site in a Texas cemetery. The statement contains four claims regarding the Confederacy, the Union, and the Civil War. The purpose of this article is to examine those claims. The text of the statement is as follows:

The Confederate dead died for states rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The people of the South, animated by the spirit of 1776, to preserve their rights, withdrew from the federal compact in 1861. The North resorted to coercion. The South, against overwhelming numbers and resources, fought until exhausted.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Civil War News, Historical Doccuments | Leave a Comment »